This one got lost in my ‘drafts’. Thought I’d drag it out and finish it after reading one of Sowell’s latests.
Besides the food, wine, company, and scenery, one of my favorite parts of my recent vacation to france was visiting Normandy. The Beaches of Normandy themselves are like a giant outdoor museum. We also went to to the Peace Museum in Caen, a city that was practically oblitterated during the war. Ironically enough, the Peace Museum is really a war memorial museum. Since we planned to visit the Normandy beaches, the boyfriend and I spend most of our museum trip looking at the WWI and WWII exhibits. The Franco-German armistice communications and the lead up to France’s call to arms was very interesting, but what intrigued me the most, was reviewing the period of time between the two World Wars, a historic period I’d last studied way back in my highschool Holocaust class. For those who are as deficient in historical studies as I am, here is my very brief perspective on how the Germans came to power.
If it is a stretch to say “we all know that the Nazis didn’t take control of Europe overnight,” it shouldn’t be. I’d like to think that most people would not be surprised if you told them that the Nazis’ domination of Europe took over 10 years (“Well, yeah, I mean, it’s not like you can blink and miss something like that”). So how did it they get away with it for so long?
I was fascinated with that question and the implications in trying to answer that for myself. I knew that we didn’t just blink and miss it, but it had been so long since I had thought about it. How did they get away with it for so long? If my recollection of Mr. Gerstein’s Holocaust studies is true, I recall thinking “how could so many nations collectively turn their heads and ignore the seizure of one nation after another by the Nazis?” I think that in hindsight, knowing of the attrocities committed by the Nazi regime, it seemed even more ridiculous to think about turning the other way and allowing Hitler to rise to power. But in reality, it is so much easier to see how this could happen.
WWI was supposed to be the war to end all wars. Germany was not even supposed to have a navy after the signing of the Treaty at Versailles. That was in 1919. When Hitler took power in 1933, he began seeking the rearmament of Germany. Rather than bitch slap him, the league of nations shook their heads and said, well, all they want is to have a military, so lets let them have it. After all, we don’t want to start another conflict. That was 1936, I think. Then, 2 years later, Germany annexed Austria. Again, the league of nations does nothing because, well, Austria belonged to Germany anyways, so why not let them have it. After all, in the wake of WWI, nobody wanted to spark another conflict with Germany.
Here’s where things get a little hairy, at least through my non-history buff eyes. Rather than attempt and muck up the sequence of things, I’ll grossly understate these historic events leading up to the invasion at Normandy as follows: France agrees to an armistice with Germany, peace at all costs blah blah blah. There was of course much wailing and gnashing of teeth as the Nazis proceeded to take over Paris and french ports, eventually leading Churchill to order an attack on French Naval bases to prevent the Nazis from seizing control over the French Navy and spreading to Great Brittain. Charles de Gaulle issues a call to arms, full blown war is eventually declared.
The take home message, for me, was that the “peace at all costs” mentallity provided the Nazis with the room to rise to power.
I thought back to the vivacious comparisons of Bush to Hitler. How ironic it is that the same folks who are making these comparisons typically support socialist ideas. Know who else called themselves socialists? The Nazis. ‘Course they really weren’t, and I would not make light of any comparisons to Hitler (Hi, I’m jewish), but helllooooo irony.
