I wonder where people pick up the notion that their own subjective oppinion is more important than getting the basic facts right. I know, I know, it’s a real brainbuster and I’m as shocked as you are 
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/27181041/
Nevermind that this article is clearly geared towards showing how the class separation is a worsening problem – something that many economic experts do not agree on. Here’s what really chapped my ass:
“The number of low-income families rose to nearly 9.6 million, or 28 percent of the total population, in 2006 from 9.2 million, or roughly 27 percent, in 2002, according to the report. The number of children in low-income families rose by roughly 800,000 during the same period, climbing to 21 million from 20.2 million.”
Published by “The associated press.”
Gotta love “the associated press” bit. I’d really like to know who authored this piece of crap, but I have a sneaking suspicion that – and I might be completely wrong here – the author’s names are concealed from the public so that they can publish misinformation that supports their own pet theories and oppinions without being called BLITHERING IDIOTS.
Dear Annonymous Blithering Idiots of the Associated Press,
I have found an error in your publication titled “Working poor problem getting worse”. You stated that the number of low-income families in 2006 was nearly 9.6 million, a figure which you then equated to 28 percent of the total US population. According to the census, the total US population in 2006 was approximately 300 million, and 9.6 million people represents approximately 3 percent of the 300 million, not 28 percent. Just thought you’d like to know so that, you know, you can avoid skewing facts in the future. You can thank me later, I’m sure you’re as shocked about this little blooper as I am, because I know that you, being a member of the press, care deeply about getting the truth out to the american people. I’m sure you made a simple little calculation error, and, since whoever is responsible for giving the stamp of approval on your work was probably too busy with real news, I thought you might appreciate the feedback.
Sincerely,
Shoothouse Barbie
**Update**
Fighting for Liberty has offered up THIS tastey morsel. I wonder if today is national hate-on-the-AP day. If not, we should really consider making a more concentrated effort to get hate-on-the-AP day officially recognized as an important day for americans. Like ‘Sunday’, or days that end in ‘y’.
You missed one thing: that’s 9.8M families, not 9.8M people.
However, it’s still a stretch to think that 9.8M / 28% = 35M families equates to 300M people. That would be an average of ~8.5 people/family. I don’t think so.
Also remember that what they call “poverty” is not absolute poverty. Instead, it’s poverty relative to the population mean. By definition, it will never go to zero unless we all earn the same wage.
If you’ve ever traveled outside the U.S., say Mexico, parts of the Caribbean, the Middle East, etc., then you’ve probably seen people who know what real, absolute poverty is and would dearly love to be upgraded to being “relatively” poor here.
Finally, they don’t consider the effects of all the aid programs low-income families are eligible for. If they take full advantage of the largess of government and private aid programs, they’ll be much better off that the raw number suggest.
Oh yeah, low-skill, low-income workers got some “help” this year from Congress too. Congress passed a significant increase in the federal minimum wage which took effect this summer. This is supposed to help these very people, but I suspect it backfired. Right after it took effect, the jobless rate spiked. Imagine that.
I have to be fair though, in that the magnitude of the spike was boosted by another, coincident event. Congress, in its (in)finite wisdom also passed an extension of the duration of jobless benefits of 13 weeks. Many people managed to hold on until that also took effect before laying off the people who’d been priced out of the market. That way, instead of 26 weeks of benefits, they’ll get 39 weeks instead. The two events combined make the recent spike in the jobless rate the greatest in several years.
Remember the nine most frightening words in English? “I’m from the government and I’m here to help.”
Sorry for the rant, but listening to the “blathering class” wears on a body, and since it’s an election year, it’s worse than usual.
All good points there. I still think the AP wanted to intentionally mislead me, but that judgement could be tainted by the fact that I think the associated press is a bunch of dirty tricksters.
As far as what you said about where our “relatively poor” people ranks on the global scale, and the minimum wage shenanigans, you get a big “aaaaaand how.”
The minimum wage is not supposed to support entire families! If you are older than 20 and can’t advance beyond a minimum wage job, you’re either a complete moron, or you haven’t learned how to show up to work not-drunk. Or maybe both.
I’ve been called callous about my stance, but I have a hard time sympathizing with people who aren’t driven to better themselves. I’m not saying the poor should be expected to pull themselves up by their bootstraps, but do as nature intended and fight for survival already. If I had to squeeze $400 extra bones out of my monthly salary to afford night classes or a car so that I could do better than working at the local fast food chain, I could do it. I live on a grad student stipend and yet I managed to save up about 3000 dollars to go to Europe, plus I fly to Tucson every other month, plus I get an hour long massage every other week. Not to mention I eat fancy shmancy fresh produce, plus I buy expensive guns.
Sowell talks about how the aid programs aren’t factored in to the income of these low-income families, and how, like you said, if you account for government assistance, we have the richest poor people in the world.
I LOVE the idea of “Hate-on-the-media” Day. Like National Ammo Day.
Judd sez:
“It’s bad but it says 9.6 million families are low income, which is 28% of the total (according to al-AP). That means there are 34,285,714 and 2/7 families in the US. If you divide the approximate population (300,000,000) by that exact number of families you get exactly 8 3/4 people per family in the United States. Exactly 8.75. I do believe someone has carefully massaged the data to obtain a desired outcome. And it was MSDNC that reported this?
I would also ask about how many of those 9.6 million low income families are in this country illegally but that would probably make me a bigot.”
welcome to my blog, Judd.